A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RESPONSE COMPETITION HYPOTHESIS.STANG DJ.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 6; PP. 530-532; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY THE OPPORTUNITY TO ATTACK DURING AN INTERVAL FOOD REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE = MAINTIEN DE LA REPONSE DUE A LA POSSIBILITE D'ATTAQUE DURANT UN PLAN DE RENFORCEMENT ALIMENTAIRE AVEC INTERVALLECHEREK DR; THOMPSON T; HEISTAD GT et al.1973; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 19; NO 1; PP. 113-123; BIBL. 1P.Article

DOUBLE STIMULATION WITH VARYING RESPONSE REQUIREMENTSKANTOWITZ BH.1974; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 103; NO 6; PP. 1092-1107; BIBL. 26REFArticle

MARBE'S LAW, STIMULUS EXPECTANCY AND RESPONSE COMPETITION = LA LOI MARBE, L'EXPECTATION DU STIMULUS ET LA COMPETITION DES REPONSESSTILSON DW; HAASETH K; WALSMITH CR et al.1972; AMER. J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 85; NO 4; PP. 549-567; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

MERE EXPOSURE VERSUS FAMILIARITY, WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR RESPONSE COMPETITION AND EXPECTANCY AROUSAL HYPOTHESES = EFFETS DE LA SIMPLE PRESENTATION DU STIMULUS ET EFFETS DE LA FAMILIARITE DU STIMULUS AVEC DES IMPLICATIONS CONCERNANT LES HYPOTHESES DE LA COMPETITION DE REPONSE ET D'ACTIVATION DE L'ATTENTECRANDALL JE; MONTGOMERY VE; REES WW et al.1973; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 88; NO 1; PP. 105-120; BIBL. 1 P.Article

THE EFFECT OF FIRST RESPONSE COMPLEXITY ON THE SPSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD: A REANALYSISNINIO A.1975; MEMORY AND COGNIT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 160-166; BIBL. 30REFArticle

EXTINCTION AND REINFORCEMENT OF ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIORLEITENBERG H; RAWSON RA; MULICK JA et al.1975; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 640-652; BIBL. 17REFArticle

THE EFFECT OF CEREBRAL DOMINANCE ON TIME SHARING BETWEEN SPEAKING AND TAPPING BY PRESCHOOL CHILDREN.KINSBOURNE M; MCMURRAY J.1975; CHILD DEVELOP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 46; NO 1; PP. 240-242; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

APPLICATION OF VARIABLE CRITERION THEORY TO CHOISE REACTION TIME.GRICE GR; NULLMEYER R; SPIKER VA et al.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 5; PP. 431-449; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A REVIEW OF THEORY AND RESEARCH ON MILLER'S RESPONSE COMPETITION (CONFLICT) MODELS.HEILIZER F.1977; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 97; NO 2; PP. 227-280; BIBL. 8 P. 1/2Article

VISUAL PREPOTENCY AND EYE ORIENTATION.COLAVITA FB; TOMKO R; WEISBERG D et al.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 25-26; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

HABIT REVERSAL VS NEGATIVE PRACTICE TREATMENT OF SELF-DESTRUCTIVE ORAL HABITS (BITING, CHEWING OR LICKING OF THE LIPS, CHEEKS, TONGUE OR PALATE)AZRIN NH; NUNN RG; FRANTZ RENSHAW SE et al.1982; J. BEHAV. THER. EXP. PSYCHIATRY; ISSN 0005-7916; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 49-54; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

COMPLEXITY, RESPONSE COMPETITION, AND PREFERENCE. IMPLICATIONS FOR AFFECTIVE CONSEQUENCES OF REPEATED EXPOSURE.HEYDUK RG; BAHRICK LE.1977; MOTIVAT. AND EMOT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 1; NO 3; PP. 249-259; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

RESPONSE DEPENDENCE IN SIMULTANEOUSLY LEARNED A-B, A-C LISTSBELLEZZA FS; SCHIRMANN NJ.1975; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 89-94; BIBL. 17REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF AROUSAL ON STROOP COLOR-WORD TASK PERFORMANCE.PALLAK MS; PITTMAK TS; HELLER JF et al.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 248-250; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE STROOP PHENOMENON: PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT OR RESPONSE COMPETION.DOEHRMAN S; LANDAU R; O'CONNELL D et al.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 47; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1127-1131; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

REWARD-INDUCED DECREASED PLAY EFFECTS: REATTRIBUTION OF MOTIVATION, COMPETING RESPONSES, OR AVOIDING FRUSTATION.PERRY DG; BUSSEY K; REDMAN J et al.1977; CHILD DEVELOP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 48; NO 4; PP. 1369-1374; BIBL. 1 P.Article

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN REINFORCED RESPONSES AND COLLATERAL RESPONSES.IVERSEN JH.1976; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 26; NO 3; PP. 399-413; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

THE DEVELOPMENT OF WATER-INTAKE REGULATION DURING SCHEDULE-INDUCED POLYDIPSIAMAGYAR RL; WALDBILLIG RJ; MEYER ME et al.1980; PHYSIOL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0031-9384; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 25; NO 5; PP. 763-767; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE RESOLUTION OF APPROACH-AVOIDANCE CONFLICTYELEN DR.1979; J. RES. PERSONALITY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 326-350; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL POWER FUNCTIONS.STADDON JER.1978; PSYCHOL. REV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 4; PP. 305-320; BIBL. 2 P.Article

A COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF STIMULUS COMPLEXITY AND RESPONSE COMPETITION ON SCHIZOPHRENICSHIRT M; GENSHAFT J.1980; BRIT. J. SOC. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 167-171; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

STROOP INTERFERENCE. AN INPUT AND AN OUTPUT PHENOMENONSTIRLING N.1979; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 121-132; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

COMPETING RESPONSE DECREMENT AS A MEASURE OF ESCAPE LEARNING AND MEMORY IN YOUNG MICE: EFFECT OF LEARNED INHIBITION, MATURATION, OR AGE-DEPENDENT SHOCK SENSITIVITY.NAGY ZM; BURLEY JW; KIKSTADT LK et al.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 21-24; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ELIMINATING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LEARNING DISABLED AND NONDISABLED CHILDREN ON A PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING TASKBRYANT ND; GETTINGER M.1981; J. EDUC. RES. (WASH.); ISSN 0022-0671; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 74; NO 5; PP. 342-346; BIBL. 19 REF.Article